JFYI - found an issue with this patch that wouldn't have shown up on i915, info
down below:
On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 01:40 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, the review as I promised:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:23:09PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > This is just an atomic version of mode_valid, which is intended to be
> > used for situations where a driver might need to check the atomic state
> > of objects other than the connector itself. One such example is with
> > MST, where the maximum possible bandwidth on a connector can change
> > dynamically irregardless of the display configuration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h | 6 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 65 ++++++++++++++--------
> > include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h | 41 ++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h
> > index f0a66ef47e5ad..ca767cba6094d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h
> > @@ -73,8 +73,10 @@ enum drm_mode_status drm_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc
> > *crtc,
> > const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> > enum drm_mode_status drm_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> > const struct drm_display_mode
> > *mode);
> > -enum drm_mode_status drm_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector
> > *connector,
> > - struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> > +enum drm_mode_status
> > +drm_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx);
> >
> > struct drm_encoder *
> > drm_connector_get_single_encoder(struct drm_connector *connector);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> > index 466dfbba82564..3132784736841 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> > @@ -86,16 +86,17 @@ drm_mode_validate_flag(const struct drm_display_mode
> > *mode,
> > return MODE_OK;
> > }
> >
> > -static enum drm_mode_status
> > +static int
> > drm_mode_validate_pipeline(struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > - struct drm_connector *connector)
> > + struct drm_connector *connector,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > {
> > struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> > - enum drm_mode_status ret = MODE_OK;
> > struct drm_encoder *encoder;
> > + int ret = MODE_OK;
> >
> > /* Step 1: Validate against connector */
> > - ret = drm_connector_mode_valid(connector, mode);
> > + ret = drm_connector_mode_valid(connector, mode, ctx);
> > if (ret != MODE_OK)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -196,16 +197,23 @@ enum drm_mode_status drm_encoder_mode_valid(struct
> > drm_encoder *encoder,
> > return encoder_funcs->mode_valid(encoder, mode);
> > }
> >
> > -enum drm_mode_status drm_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector
> > *connector,
> > - struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > +int
> > +drm_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > {
> > const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs *connector_funcs =
> > connector->helper_private;
> >
> > - if (!connector_funcs || !connector_funcs->mode_valid)
> > + if (!connector_funcs)
> > return MODE_OK;
> >
> > - return connector_funcs->mode_valid(connector, mode);
> > + if (connector_funcs->mode_valid_ctx)
> > + return connector_funcs->mode_valid_ctx(connector, mode, ctx);
> > + else if (connector_funcs->mode_valid)
> > + return connector_funcs->mode_valid(connector, mode);
> > + else
> > + return MODE_OK;
> > }
> >
> > #define DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD (10*HZ)
> > @@ -375,8 +383,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_helper_probe_detect);
> > * (if specified)
> > * - drm_mode_validate_flag() checks the modes against basic connector
> > * capabilities (interlace_allowed,doublescan_allowed,stereo_allowed)
> > - * - the optional &drm_connector_helper_funcs.mode_valid helper can
> > perform
> > - * driver and/or sink specific checks
> > + * - the optional &drm_connector_helper_funcs.mode_valid or
> > + * &drm_connector_helper_funcs.mode_valid_ctx helpers can perform
> > driver
> > + * and/or sink specific checks
> > * - the optional &drm_crtc_helper_funcs.mode_valid,
> > * &drm_bridge_funcs.mode_valid and
> > &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.mode_valid
> > * helpers can perform driver and/or source specific checks which are
> > also
> > @@ -507,22 +516,34 @@ int drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct
> > drm_connector *connector,
> > mode_flags |= DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_MASK;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry(mode, &connector->modes, head) {
> > - if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > - mode->status = drm_mode_validate_driver(dev, mode);
> > + if (mode->status != MODE_OK)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_driver(dev, mode);
> > + if (mode->status != MODE_OK)
> > + continue;
> >
> > - if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > - mode->status = drm_mode_validate_size(mode, maxX, maxY);
> > + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_size(mode, maxX, maxY);
> > + if (mode->status != MODE_OK)
> > + continue;
> >
> > - if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > - mode->status = drm_mode_validate_flag(mode, mode_flags);
> > + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_flag(mode, mode_flags);
> > + if (mode->status != MODE_OK)
> > + continue;
> >
> > - if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > - mode->status = drm_mode_validate_pipeline(mode,
> > - connector);
> > + ret = drm_mode_validate_pipeline(mode, connector, &ctx);
> > + if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
> > + drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
> > + goto retry;
> > + } else if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0)) {
> > + mode->status = MODE_BAD;
This check is wrong actually. We define negative values for drm_mode_status
(MODE_BAD, MODE_ERROR, MODE_STALE) which, at least with how drivers currently
seem to use them, are something we want to treat as not-unexpected errors and
not WARN_ON.
This is a bit annoying because it does mean there's some overlap between
drm_mode_status and some legitimate errno values (EPERM, ENOENT, ESRCH). Luckily
I can't see any reason why drivers would want to return those, but I think we
should probably print a debugging message when we get any errno values just so
developers don't get confused (also going to add a IS_ERR() equivalent for
drm_mode_status, but with a different name)
> > + } else {
> > + mode->status = ret;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > - mode->status = drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(mode,
> > - connector);
> > + if (mode->status != MODE_OK)
> > + continue;
> > + mode->status = drm_mode_validate_ycbcr420(mode, connector);
> > }
> >
> > prune:
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > b/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > index 421a30f084631..8f020c3424b2b 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > @@ -968,6 +968,47 @@ struct drm_connector_helper_funcs {
> > */
> > enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * @mode_valid_ctx:
> > + *
> > + * Callback to validate a mode for a connector, irrespective of the
> > + * specific display configuration.
> > + *
> > + * This callback is used by the probe helpers to filter the mode list
> > + * (which is usually derived from the EDID data block from the sink).
> > + * See e.g. drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes().
> > + *
> > + * This function is optional, and is the atomic version of
> > + * &drm_connector_funcs.mode_valid.
> > + *
> > + * To allow for accessing the atomic state of modesetting objects, the
> > + * helper libraries always call this with ctx set to a valid context,
> > + * and &drm_mode_config.connection_mutex will always be locked with
> > + * the ctx parameter set to @ctx. This allows for taking additional
> > + * locks as required.
> > + *
> > + * Even though additional locks may be acquired, this callback is
> > + * still expected not to take any constraints into account which would
> > + * be influenced by the currently set display state - such constraints
> > + * should be handled in the driver's atomic check. For example, if a
> > + * connector shares display bandwidth with other connectors then it
> > + * would be ok to validate a mode uses against the maximum possible
> ^mode against?
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > + * bandwidth of the connector. But it wouldn't be ok to take the
> > + * current bandwidth usage of other connectors into account, as this
> > + * would change depending on the display state.
> > + *
> > + * Returns:
> > + *
> > + * Either &drm_mode_status.MODE_OK, one of the failure reasons in
> > + * &enum drm_mode_status, or -EDEADLK if a deadlock would have
> > + * occurred and we need to backoff.
> > + *
> > + */
> > + int (*mode_valid_ctx)(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx);
> > +
> > /**
> > * @best_encoder:
> > *
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
