Hi,
On 7/1/20 4:10 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for reviewing most of the patchset.
Am 30.06.20 um 11:06 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and
a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the
hardware.
The new driver, called simplekms, binds to a simple-frambuffer platform
device. The kernel's boot code creates such devices for firmware-provided
framebuffers, such as EFI-GOP or VESA. Typically the BIOS, UEFI or boot
loader sets up the framebuffers. Description via device tree is also an
option.
Simplekms is small enough to be linked into the kernel. The driver's main
purpose is to provide graphical output during the early phases of the boot
process, before the native DRM drivers are available. Native drivers are
typically loaded from an initrd ram disk. Occationally simplekms can also
serve as interim solution on graphics hardware without native DRM driver.
Cool, thank you for doing this, this is a very welcome change,
but ... (see below).
So far distributions rely on fbdev drivers, such as efifb, vesafb or
simplefb, for early-boot graphical output. However fbdev is deprecated and
the drivers do not provide DRM interfaces for modern userspace.
Patches 1 and 2 prepare the DRM format helpers for simplekms.
Patches 3 to 7 add the simplekms driver. It's build on simple DRM helpers
and SHMEM. It supports 16-bit, 24-bit and 32-bit RGB framebuffers. During
pageflips, SHMEM buffers are copied into the framebuffer memory, similar
to cirrus or mgag200. The code in patches 6 and 7 handles clocks and
regulators. It's based on the simplefb drivers, but has been modified for
DRM.
Patches 8 and 9 add a hand-over mechanism. Simplekms acquires it's
framebuffer's I/O-memory range and provides a callback function to be
removed by a native driver. The native driver will remove simplekms before
taking over the hardware. The removal is integrated into existing helpers,
so drivers use it automatically.
I tested simplekms with x86 EFI and VESA framebuffers, which both work
reliably. The fbdev console and Weston work automatically. Xorg requires
manual configuration of the device. Xorgs current modesetting driver does
not work with both, platform and PCI device, for the same physical
hardware. Once configured, X11 works.
Ugh, Xorg not working OOTB is a bit of a showstopper, we cannot just go
around and break userspace. OTOH this does seem like an userspace issue
and not something which we can (or should try to) fix in the kernel.
I guess the solution will have to be to have this default to N for now
in Kconfig and clearly mention in the Kconfig help text that this needs
a fixed Xorg modesetting driver before it can be enabled.
Any chance you have time to work on fixing the Xorg modesetting driver
so that this will just work with the standard Xorg autoconfiguration
stuff?
Hm, why do we even have both platform and pci drivers visible at the
same time? I thought the point of this is that simplekms is built-in,
then initrd loads the real drm driver, and by the time Xorg is
running, simplekms should be long gone.
Maybe a few more details of what's going wrong and why to help unconfuse me?
I tested simplekms with PCI graphics cards.
Xorg does it's own scanning of the busses. It supports a platform bus,
where it finds the simple-framebuffer device that is driven by
simplekms. Xorg also scans the PCI bus, where is finds the native PCI
device; usually driven by the native driver. It's the same hardware, but
on different busses.
For each device, Xorg tries to configure a screen, the Xorg modeset
driver tried to open the DRM device file and acquire DRM master status
on it. This works for the first screen, but DRM master status can only
be acquired once, so it fails for the second screen. Xorg then aborts
and asks for manual configuration of the display device.
This can be solved by setting the platform device's bus id in the
xorg.conf device section. It just doesn't happen automatically.
I found it hard to find a solution to this. Weston just opens a DRM
device file and uses whatever it gets. Ideally, Xorg would do the same.
That whole bus-scanning exercise gives it a wrong idea on which graphics
devices are available.
One idea for a fix is to compare the device I/O-memory ranges and filter
out duplicates on the Xorg modeset driver. I don't know how reliable
this works in practice or if their are false positives.
I think that this should work nicely, although I wonder how Xorg will
get the memory-range for the simplefb platform device, it looks like
it will need to parse /dev/iomem for this, or we need to add a
new sysfs attr to the simplefb device for this. Adding the new sysfs
attr has the added bonus that we only enable the duplicate based
resource check for simplefb devices.
Hmm, I think we can actually fix this quite simply, for the platform
device, check the basename of where the
/sys/bus/platform/devices/XXXX/driver symlink points to and if it
is simplekms ignore it, assuming that there will be another PCI
or platform device which is the actual GPU.
I guess that might cause a problem where the output-device driven
through simplekms is not visible to Xorg in any other way, but
I don't think that that ever happens? And even if it does, then it
is probably better to teach Xorg about it, since we likely want to
replace simplekms with a more full-featured driver at some point
anyways.
Can you try commenting out the platform bus scanning code in Xorg's
autoconfigure code and see if that fixes the no Xorg.conf case ?
If it does the driver symlink trick will probably fix 99.9 %
of all cases here, and we can worry about the others if we
ever encounter them.
A more fundamental solution is to introduce a DRM bus in Xorg that
enumerates all available DRM device files. If there are any, no other
busses would be scanned.
That would break the case where there are 2 cards and 1 has a kms
driver and the other only supports fbdev. Admittedly this is a
corner case, but I do believe that we cannot just go and break this.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
