Re: [RFC] Host1x/TegraDRM UAPI (sync points)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



29.06.2020 13:27, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
...
>> We don't need a dedicated sync point FD for all kinds of jobs, don't we?
>> For example, I don't see why a sync point FD may be needed in a case of
>> Opentegra jobs.
> 
> I think it's cleaner if we have just one way to allocate syncpoints, and
> then those syncpoints can be passed to different things depending on the
> situation.
> 
> If we want to protect direct incrementing while a job is submitted, we
> could have a locking API where an ongoing job can take a lock refcount
> in the syncpoint, and incrementing would return -EBUSY.

Okay, let's go with this for now.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux