On Friday, June 26, 2020 11:15 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have no opinion really if adding yet another set of the same > definitions is good or not. We do need the UAPI doc, but that does not > necessarily mean we also need definition code in UAPI headers. > > I give this one a shrug. But then uapi docs don't document uapi, instead document internal kernel enums? And also user-space not using libdrm needs to have these hardcoded somewhere. The libdrm re-definitions are annoying. Maybe a better way forward would be to have a "status" prop, which could then also be used for the planned fine-grained uapi events. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
