Hi Hsin-Yi,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:01:09PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> Disable the plane if it's not visible. Otherwise mtk_ovl_layer_config()
> would proceed with invalid plane and we may see vblank timeout.
>
> Fixes: 119f5173628a ("drm/mediatek: Add DRM Driver for Mediatek SoC MT8173.")
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Add fixes tag
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> index c2bd683a87c8..74dc71c7f3b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> true, true);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane,
> + struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> +{
> + struct mtk_plane_state *state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> +
> + state->pending.enable = false;
> + wmb(); /* Make sure the above parameter is set before update */
> + state->pending.dirty = true;
> +}
> +
> static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> {
> @@ -178,6 +188,9 @@ static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> if (!crtc || WARN_ON(!fb))
> return;
>
> + if (!plane->state->visible)
> + return mtk_plane_atomic_disable(plane, old_state);
nit: Both this function and mtk_plane_atomic_disable() have the void return
type. Perhaps we should rather move the return, without a value, to a
separate statement?
Best regards,
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
