On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:44:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/3/20 2:14 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
...
> >>
> >> This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might
> >> have issues on various architectures.
> >>
> >> Can folks please provide an update on the testing status?
> >
> > I believe the tests were failing for Guenter due to another patch set...[1]
> >
> > My tests with just this series are working.
> >
> >>From my understanding the other failures were unrelated.[2]
> >
> > <quote Mike Rapoport>
> > I've checked the patch above on top of the mmots which already has
> > Ira's patches and it booted fine. I've used sparc32_defconfig to build
> > the kernel and qemu-system-sparc with default machine and CPU.
> > </quote>
> >
> > Mike, am I wrong? Do you think the kmap() patches are still causing issues?
> >
>
> For my part, all I can say is that -next is in pretty bad shape right now.
> The summary of my tests says:
>
> Build results:
> total: 151 pass: 130 fail: 21
> Qemu test results:
> total: 430 pass: 375 fail: 55
>
> sparc32 smp images in next-20200603 still crash for me with a spinlock
> recursion. s390 images hang early in boot. Several others (alpha, arm64,
> various ppc) don't even compile. I can run some more bisects over time,
> but this is becoming a full-time job :-(.
>
I'm not sure what the process here is. I just applied my series[1] on
Linus' Master branch[2] and ran sparc32 and s290 from your tests.
sparc32: (passes)
21:43:49 > /home/iweiny/dev/linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
Build reference: v5.7-7188-g67a7a97e8a0f
Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ...... .... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
s390: (does not compile)
<stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
In file included from ./arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:6:0,
from ./include/linux/bug.h:5,
from ./include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
from ./include/linux/mm.h:9,
from mm/huge_memory.c:8:
mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'hugepage_init':
./include/linux/compiler.h:403:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_127' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: ((13 + (13-3))-13) >= 9
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:384:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:403:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/bug.h:24:4: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
BUILD_BUG_ON(cond); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/huge_memory.c:403:2: note: in expansion of macro 'MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON'
MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER >= MAX_ORDER);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:267: mm/huge_memory.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1735: mm] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
------------
The s390 error is the same on Linus' master and linux-next. So whatever is
causing that has slipped into mainline and/or is something I've broken in the
test scripts.
With linux-next on sparc I too see the spinlock issue; something like:
...
Starting syslogd: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, S01syslogd/139
lock: 0xf53ef350, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: S01syslogd/139, .owner_cpu: 0
CPU: 0 PID: 139 Comm: S01syslogd Not tainted 5.7.0-next-20200603 #1
[f0067d00 :
do_raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0xd8 ]
[f00d598c :
copy_page_range+0x328/0x804 ]
[f0025c34 :
dup_mm+0x334/0x434 ]
[f0027198 :
copy_process+0x1248/0x12d4 ]
[f00273b8 :
_do_fork+0x54/0x30c ]
[f00276e4 :
do_fork+0x5c/0x6c ]
[f000de44 :
sparc_do_fork+0x18/0x38 ]
[f000b7f4 :
do_syscall+0x34/0x40 ]
[5010cd4c :
0x5010cd4c ]
qemu-system-sparc: terminating on signal 15 from pid 2000056 (/bin/bash)
...
FWIW I don't see any of this being an issue with the kmap() code but I agree
things could be cleaner. How can we back linux-next off a bit? I'm not an
expert here with how linux-next works.
For example I just picked the latest patch from me within the linux-next tree:
2e483306d5a8 arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: don't enable pagefault/preempt twice
And built from there it looks good for sparc.
23:01:31 > /home/iweiny/dev/linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
Build reference: v5.7-719-g2e483306d5a8
Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running .......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......^[[1;2D... passed
Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
I'm going to bisect between there and HEAD.
Ira
[1]
67a7a97e8a0f arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice
4a3dd9ec36d8 kmap: Consolidate kmap_prot definitions
a3b39b1668ac sparc: Remove unnecessary includes
452195c6e8a8 parisc/kmap: Remove duplicate kmap code
317e4af1da94 kmap: Remove kmap_atomic_to_page()
e11e52415a4d drm: Remove drm specific kmap_atomic code
afd4911f0cfb arch/kmap: Define kmap_atomic_prot() for all arch's
2a5524d63341 arch/kmap: Don't hard code kmap_prot values
c94bbaab0296 arch/kmap: Ensure kmap_prot visibility
6f29a6b66d3b arch/kunmap_atomic: Consolidate duplicate code
0c7122ef07d1 arch/kmap_atomic: Consolidate duplicate code
63b8bbf47723 {x86,powerpc,microblaze}/kmap: Move preempt disable
23b3175de76f arch/kunmap: Remove duplicate kunmap implementations
9514dd54fda8 arch/kmap: Remove redundant arch specific kmaps
e92e53c0080b arch/xtensa: Move kmap build bug out of the way
cab1afa4f6ac arch/kmap: Remove BUG_ON()
[2] cb8e59cc8720 (linus/master, linus-master) Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
