On 10/05/2020 17:55, Clément Péron wrote:
This use devfreq variable that will be lock with spinlock in future
patches. We should either introduce a function to access this one
but as devfreq is optional let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
As far as I can tell this should be safe. As you note this wouldn't work
without devfreq anyway.
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
index 7914b1570841..63e32a9f2749 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
@@ -581,10 +581,6 @@ int panfrost_job_is_idle(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
struct panfrost_job_slot *js = pfdev->js;
int i;
- /* Check whether the hardware is idle */
- if (atomic_read(&pfdev->devfreq.busy_count))
- return false;
-
for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++) {
/* If there are any jobs in the HW queue, we're not idle */
if (atomic_read(&js->queue[i].sched.hw_rq_count))
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
