This code was using get_user_pages(), in a "Case 2" scenario (DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's time to convert the get_user_pages() + release_pages() calls to pin_user_pages() + unpin_user_pages() calls. There is some helpful background in [2]: basically, this is a small part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and file systems' use of those pages. [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages": https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/ Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi, I'm compile tested this, but unable to run-time test, so any testing help is much appriciated. --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c index 5d50c9e..e927de2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static int radeon_ttm_tt_pin_userptr(struct ttm_tt *ttm) uint64_t userptr = gtt->userptr + pinned * PAGE_SIZE; struct page **pages = ttm->pages + pinned; - r = get_user_pages(userptr, num_pages, write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, + r = pin_user_pages(userptr, num_pages, write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, pages, NULL); if (r < 0) goto release_pages; @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static int radeon_ttm_tt_pin_userptr(struct ttm_tt *ttm) kfree(ttm->sg); release_pages: - release_pages(ttm->pages, pinned); + unpin_user_pages(ttm->pages, pinned); return r; } @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static void radeon_ttm_tt_unpin_userptr(struct ttm_tt *ttm) set_page_dirty(page); mark_page_accessed(page); - put_page(page); + unpin_user_page(page); } sg_free_table(ttm->sg); -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel