Am 11.05.20 um 22:56 schrieb Al Dunsmuir:
Hello Dave,
On Monday, May 11, 2020, 4:43:01 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:28, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[SNIP]
Maybe we can find some way to compartmentalise AGP further?
Dave.
Significantly reduced caching on memory accesses definitely sounds
like something that would be noticeable and objectionable.
I would speculate that this would also vary a lot across chipsets,
depending on the capabilities of the PCI MMU vs the AGP MMU.
In the end, it may be best to leave things as is, or as Dave suggested
try to keep AGP in the picture.
The problem is that AGP was never really supported/implemented that well
in the first place.
The fact that the core linux kernel and the DMA API doesn't support
uncached memory and we had to change the caching attributes of pages
under the hood has resulted in a huge number of problems over the years.
Keeping it as it is is also not a really doable option because TTM
already has major problems keeping up with the requirements for modern
hardware, see my presentation here as well:
https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/ttm/
Redesigning the old AGP support into something which isn't so ugly and
doesn't blocks the new requirements has the huge risk of breaking things
even harder, e.g. black screen instead of just reduced performance.
So removing/disabling AGP by default still sounds like the best option
to me for end users.
Nothing is ever simple, is it?
At least not with AGP, no :) It has been a total beast to support and
keep working.
Do I get this right that I can ping you to test things?
Thanks for the feedback,
Christian.
Al
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
