Hi Christoph,
On 05.05.2020 12:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static inline int dma_map_sgtable_attrs(struct device *dev,
>> + struct sg_table *sgt, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> Two tab indents for parameter continuation, please.
>
> Can we also skip the separate _attrs version? The existing ones have the
> separate _attrs variant as there were pre-existing versions without the
> attrs argument and lots of users, but that doesn't really apply here as
> an extra 0 argument isn't really an issue.
Okay.
>> +static inline size_t iommu_map_sgtable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> + unsigned long iova, struct sg_table *sgt, int prot)
>> +{
>> + return iommu_map_sg(domain, iova, sgt->sgl, sgt->orig_nents, prot);
>> +}
> Should this be a separate patch due to the different subsystems?
>
> FYI, I'll happily pick up the prep patches in an immutable branch of
> the dma-mapping tree one we have settled on the details.
Okay.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
