On 5/4/2020 2:29 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> The current code checks that the whole OOB area is erased.
> This is a problem when JFFS2 cleanmarkers are added to the OOB, since it will
> fail due to the usable OOB bytes not being 0xff.
> Correct this by only checking that the ECC aren't 0xff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx>
Can you provide a Fixes: tag for this change?
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index e4e3ceeac38f..546f0807b887 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -2018,6 +2018,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> static int brcmstb_nand_verify_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf, u64 addr)
> {
> + struct mtd_oob_region oobecc;
> int i, sas;
> void *oob = chip->oob_poi;
> int bitflips = 0;
> @@ -2035,11 +2036,24 @@ static int brcmstb_nand_verify_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++, oob += sas) {
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
> ecc_chunk = buf + chip->ecc.size * i;
> - ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(ecc_chunk,
> - chip->ecc.size,
> - oob, sas, NULL, 0,
> +
> + ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(ecc_chunk, chip->ecc.size,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, 0,
> + chip->ecc.strength);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + bitflips = max(bitflips, ret);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; mtd->ooblayout->ecc(mtd, i, &oobecc) != -ERANGE; i++)
> + {
> + ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(NULL, 0,
> + oob + oobecc.offset,
> + oobecc.length,
> + NULL, 0,
> chip->ecc.strength);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
