On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:42:13PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > On 14/04/2020 20:16, Clément Péron wrote: > > That's can be reworked and Panfrost can only probe regulator if there > > is no opp-table. > This is what I was thinking about looking at. But it may make sense instead > to extend the regulator API to allow multiple regualtor_get() calls for a > single device. I haven't had time to dig into how difficult this would be. To repeat what I said before we don't actively stop this, it's just not something that seems particularly tasteful and the warning does find actual errors. I definitely don't think it's a good idea to extend the API for this. > Ideally calling regulator_get a second time for the same device would simply > return the same struct regulator object (with a reference count increment). One of the goals with the distinct struct regulator is to make sure that we track all the user's activity together - if we mix multiple users in there it becomes harder to tell if something is going wrong.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
