Re: KMS enums and bitfields UAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:38:37PM +0000, Simon Ser wrote:
> Daniel Vetter, Ville, any thoughts about this?

Magic 8ball says "unclear", and I feel like I keep flip-flopping around on
this.

I think best-case outcome here is that we're a) consistent across
compositors and b) document that consensus in the kernel's uapi section
(for lack of better places).

I'm not hung up on what exactly that consensus should be, as long as it's
a consistent across projects. If you folks can't figure this out I'll do a
live youtube sessions and throw a dice :-P

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux