Can you make sure this lands in drm-misc?
Thanks,
Alex
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:15 AM Koenig, Christian
<Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 10.04.2020 12:58 schrieb "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>:
>
> The delayed delete list is per device which might be very huge. And in
> a heavy workload test, the list might always not be empty. That will
> trigger any RCU stall warnings or softlockups in non-preemptible kernels
> Lets do break out the loops in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxx>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 9e07c3f75156..c5b516fa4eae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static bool ttm_bo_delayed_delete(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, bool remove_all)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&removed);
>
> spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
> - while (!list_empty(&bdev->ddestroy)) {
> + while (!list_empty(&bdev->ddestroy) && !need_resched()) {
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo;
>
> bo = list_first_entry(&bdev->ddestroy, struct ttm_buffer_object,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
