On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:29 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> # build
>
> This works too, missed it when replying to Linus
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Linus I guess this one is better, but like I explained it really
> doesn't matter what we do with drm legacy code, it's a horror show
> that should be disabled on all modern distros anyway. We just keep it
> because of "never break old uapi".
Ok, That patch from Chris looks fine to me too.
dma_addr_t and resource_size_t aren't the same, but at least
dma_addr_t should always be the bigger one.
And it does look like nothing else ever takes the address of this
field, so the ones that might want just the resource_size_t part will
at least have enough bits.
So I think Chris' patch is the way to go. I'm assuming I'll get it
through the normal drm tree channels, this doesn't sound _so_ urgent
that I'd need to expedite that patch into my tree and apply it
directly.
Thanks,
Linus
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
