On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:44 AM Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - For dumb buffers, virtio_gpu_gem_create can notify. > - For 3D buffers, virtio_gpu_gem_object_open can notify. Hmm, I feel this is a bit complex. virtio_gpu_gem_object_open may not notify, and the caller needs to know about it. Can we change it to virtio_gpu_object_create never notifies and virtio_gpu_gem_object_open always notifies? > > Signed-off-by: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 1 - > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c > index 90c0a8ea1708..aa14dd12928e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_gem_create(struct drm_file *file, > return ret; > } > > + virtio_gpu_notify(vgdev); > *obj_p = &obj->base.base; > > /* drop reference from allocate - handle holds it now */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > index d9039bb7c5e3..51a8da7d5ef3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ int virtio_gpu_object_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > return ret; > } > > - virtio_gpu_notify(vgdev); > *bo_ptr = bo; > return 0; > > -- > 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel