Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 09:35:02PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > The max() function call in horizontal timing calculation shouldn't pad a > length already subtracted with overhead to overhead, instead it should > only prevent the set timing to underflow. Some explanation on why it shouldn't do that would be appreciated. Also, with the changes you have below, the comments above each max call don't match anymore and should be updated. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
