On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:32:15PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
> /* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
> if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
> return;
> - /* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> - if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> - /* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> - if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> - *write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> - *fault = true;
> - }
> - return;
> - }
Yes, this is an elegant solution to the input flags.
However, between patch 3 and 4 doesn't this break amd gpu as it will
return device_private pages now if not requested? Squash the two?
Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
