Re: Plumbing explicit synchronization through the Linux ecosystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 12:31 -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:

>  - X11: With present, it has these "explicit" fence objects but
> they're always a shmfence which lets the X server and client do a
> userspace CPU-side hand-off without going over the socket (and
> round-tripping through the kernel).  However, the only thing that
> fence does is order the OpenGL API calls in the client and server and
> the real synchronization is still implicit.

I'm pretty sure "the only thing that fence does" is an implementation
detail. PresentPixmap blocks until the wait-fence signals, but when and
how it signals are properties of the fence itself. You could have drm
give the client back a fence fd, pass that to xserver to create a fence
object, and name that in the PresentPixmap request, and then drm can do
whatever it wants to signal the fence.

> From my perspective, as a Vulkan driver developer, I have to deal with
> the fact that Vulkan is an explicit sync API but Wayland and X11
> aren't.

I'm quite sure we can give you an explicit-sync X11 API. I think you
may already have one.

- ajax

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux