Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:56:11 +0100,
Christian K6nig wrote:
> 
> Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> >> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
> >> buffer limit.  Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Takashi, should I push this to drm-misc-next or do you want to merge
> that somehow else?

Please take through your tree as you like.


Thanks!

Takashi
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux