On 20-03-09 15:18, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote: > > On 20-03-03 16:52, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > > Hi Ville, > > > > > > > > On 20-03-02 22:34, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently > > > > > listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh. > > > > > > > > > > Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is > > > > > correct? > > > > > > > > Pls, check the datasheet which is linked within the comment. We hit the > > > > vrefresh exactly if we are in SYNC MODE. > > > > > > It's too much work to start hunting datasheets for all these > > > and figuring out what's going on in each case. Pls just > > > inform me which way is correct if you know the details. > > > > How do you know that the clock is wrong if it is to much work? As I said > > the clock is completely fine. > > htotal*vtotal*vrefresh != clock, so one or both are incorrect. I checked the values using this equation: clock / (htotal * vtotal) = vrefresh. Regards, Marco _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
