Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: fix false positive assert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 07:49:15PM +0800, Christian König wrote:
> Pierre-eric, just a gentle ping on this? Could I get a tested-by?
> 
> Ray can you ack or even review this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Christian.
> 
> Am 06.03.20 um 13:41 schrieb Christian König:
> > The assert sometimes incorrectly triggers when pinned BOs are destroyed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>

> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 5 ++---
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > index 2445e2bd6267..ca5a8d01ff1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > @@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ static void ttm_bo_add_mem_to_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> >   	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
> >   	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man;
> >   
> > -	dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
> > -
> >   	if (!list_empty(&bo->lru))
> >   		return;
> >   
> > @@ -611,7 +609,8 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
> >   		 */
> >   		if (bo->mem.placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT) {
> >   			bo->mem.placement &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
> > -			ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo, NULL);
> > +			ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
> > +			ttm_bo_add_mem_to_lru(bo, &bo->mem);
> >   		}
> >   
> >   		kref_init(&bo->kref);
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux