Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: anx7688: Add anx7688 bridge driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Ondřej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 04:53:46PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > 在 2020-03-06星期五的 09:46 +0100,Enric Balletbo i Serra写道:
> > > Hi Ondrej,
> > >
> > > On 5/3/20 20:35, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:29:33AM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 7:28 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
> > > > > <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Vasily,
> > > > >
> > > > > CC: Icenowy and Ondrej
> > > > > > Would you mind to check which firmware version is running the
> > > > > > anx7688 in
> > > > > > PinePhone, I think should be easy to check with i2c-tools.
> > > > >
> > > > > Icenowy, Ondrej, can you guys please check anx7688 firmware
> > > > > version?
> > > >
> > > > i2cget 0 0x28 0x00 w
> > > > 0xaaaa
> > > >
> > > > i2cget 0 0x28 0x02 w
> > > > 0x7688
> > > >
> > > > i2cget 0 0x28 0x80 w
> > > > 0x0000
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you check the value for 0x81 too?
> >
> > root@ice-pinephone [ ~ ] # i2cdump 0 0x28
> > No size specified (using byte-data access)
> > WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and
> > worse!
> > I will probe file /dev/i2c-0, address 0x28, mode byte
> > Continue? [Y/n]
> >      0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f    0123456789abcdef
> > 00: aa aa 88 76 ac 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 05    ???v?.........??
> > 10: 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    0...............
> > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 24 f2 e4 ff 00    ...........$??..
> > 30: 06 40 00 04 94 11 20 ff ff 03 00 bf ff ff 10 01    ?@.??? ..?.?..??
> > 40: 72 a4 00 09 00 08 05 84 15 40 17 00 00 0a 00 e0    r?.?.????@?..?.?
> > 50: 00 00 00 0a 10 00 e0 df ff ff 00 00 00 10 71 00    ...??.??.....?q.
> > 60: 10 10 04 29 2d 21 10 01 09 13 00 03 e8 13 88 00    ???)-!????.????.
> > 70: 00 19 18 83 16 5c 11 00 ff 00 00 0d 04 38 42 07    .????\?....??8B?
> > 80: 00 00 00 00 00 74 1b 19 44 08 75 00 00 00 00 00    .....t??D?u.....
> > 90: 01 02 00 00 00 00 03 00 ff 30 00 59 01 00 00 00    ??....?..0.Y?...
> > a0: 00 ff fe ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02    ..?............?
> > b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 28 00 00 00 00 44 08 00    ......@.(....D?.
> > c0: 00 00 00 00 80 00 10 01 0a 10 18 00 00 fd 00 00    ....?.?????..?..
> > d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> > e0: 50 10 08 50 00 02 00 70 00 00 30 10 0b 02 1c 01    P??P.?.p..0?????
> > f0: 00 0b 07 00 94 11 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 0e ff    .??.???......??.
>
> My values for 0x28 address match this. ^

What about the values at 0x2c?

> Interesting that it returns different register values for different
> device addresses.

Yes the registers have different meanings for the 2 addresses.

Thanks,
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux