On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:49 PM Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a command mode panel and the the msm/mdp5 driver uses the > vrefresh field for the actual refresh rate, while the dotclock field is > used for the DSI clocks. The dotclock needed to be a bit higher than > necessary otherwise the panel would not work. I don't know if this predates the support for defining DSI clocks but for what we have in the kernel right now this is wrong. struct mipi_dsi_device contains: * @hs_rate: maximum lane frequency for high speed mode in hertz, this should * be set to the real limits of the hardware, zero is only accepted for * legacy drivers * @lp_rate: maximum lane frequency for low power mode in hertz, this should * be set to the real limits of the hardware, zero is only accepted for * legacy drivers The MDP driver should use these frequencies for a DSI command mode panel, and the panel driver should define them. These two clocks are/can be/should be completely orthogonal to the dotclock/pixelclock inside the panel, which is likely driven from its own crystal directly from the panel-internal framebuffer. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel