Re: [RFC 2/9] mfd: Add driver for Multifunction USB Device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Noralf Trønnes wrote:

> >> +static void mud_irq_urb_completion(struct urb *urb)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct device *dev = &urb->dev->dev;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	mdebug("%s: actual_length=%u\n", __func__, urb->actual_length);
> >> +
> >> +	switch (urb->status) {
> >> +	case 0:
> >> +		mud_irq_queue(urb);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case -EPROTO:	/* FIXME: verify: dwc2 reports this on disconnect */
> > 
> > What does this mean?  Why can't you fix it now?
> 
> I don't know if this is a dwc2 driver problem or if EPROTO is a valid
> disconnect error. I haven't seen it in other gadget drivers, so I need

Note: This is not a gadget driver.  You should be looking in device 
drivers.

> to look more into this or even better if someone from USB can answer this.

See Documentation/driver-api/usb/error-codes.rst.  In short, -EPROTO is
one of several status codes you may get when an URB fails because the
device was disconnected.

> >> +	case -ECONNRESET:
> >> +	case -ENOENT:
> >> +	case -ESHUTDOWN:
> >> +		dev_dbg(dev, "irq urb shutting down with status: %d\n", urb->status);
> > 
> > s/irq/IRQ/ in all comments and prints.
> > 
> > Same with URB?
> > 
> >> +		return;
> >> +	default:
> >> +		dev_dbg(dev, "irq urb failure with status: %d\n", urb->status);
> >> +		break;
> > 
> > So it's failed, but you're going to attempt to submit it anyway?
> 
> Yes, I don't know the reason why it failed, it might succeed the next
> time. But this is also something that someone with real life experience
> with USB failures could weigh in on. Maybe I should send a reset request
> so the device can reset its state machine, I don't know.

USB connections are usually pretty reliable.  Sometimes there are
transient errors, but they are relatively rare.  No one would criticize
a driver for giving up the first time it gets an error (especially if
there was an easy way to reset it) -- but people will get annoyed if a
ton of error messages shows up on the console whenever they unplug the
device.

In general, the overall design of the driver seems to be reasonable.  
I can't judge the interfaces with other subsystems or the other aspects
of their design, but the USB part is okay.  (I haven't gone through it
in detail.)

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux