Hi Laurent, On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:31:05PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > + if (mipi_dsi_packet_format_is_short(msg->type)) { > > + u16 data = packet.header[1] | (packet.header[2] << 8); > > + r = dsi_vc_send_short(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type, data, 0); > > You use the packet for this case only, I think you could simply write > > u16 data = ((msg->tx_len > 0) ? tx[0] : 0) > | (((msg->tx_len > 1) ? tx[1] : 0) << 8); > r = dsi_vc_send_short(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type, data, 0); That probably works with 's/tx[/((u8*) msg->tx_buf)[', which looks really ugly :) This code is further simplified by a further patch, which forwards the complete message into dsi_vc_send_short(). > > } else { > > - r = dsi_vc_send_long(dsi, channel, > > - type == DSS_DSI_CONTENT_GENERIC ? > > - MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE : > > - MIPI_DSI_DCS_LONG_WRITE, data, len, 0); > > + r = dsi_vc_send_long(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type, > > + msg->tx_buf, msg->tx_len, 0); > > Indentation. Ok. > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Are you fine with keeping the mipi_dsi_packet, since it will be removed in a further patch? > > } > > > > - return r; > > -} > > - > > -static int dsi_vc_dcs_write_nosync(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, int channel, > > - const u8 *data, int len) > > -{ > > - struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev); > > - > > - return dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len, > > - DSS_DSI_CONTENT_DCS); > > -} > > - > > -static int dsi_vc_generic_write_nosync(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, int channel, > > - const u8 *data, int len) > > -{ > > - struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev); > > - > > - return dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len, > > - DSS_DSI_CONTENT_GENERIC); > > -} > > - > > -static int dsi_vc_write_common(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, > > - int channel, const u8 *data, int len, > > - enum dss_dsi_content_type type) > > -{ > > - struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev); > > - int r; > > + if (r < 0) > > + return r; > > > > - r = dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len, type); > > - if (r) > > - goto err; > > + /* > > + * we do not always have to do the BTA sync, for example we can > > + * improve performance by setting the update window information > > + * without sending BTA sync between the commands. In that case > > + * we can return earily. > > s/earily/early/ > > Do I understand correctly that this isn't implemented yet ? You should > make it clear in the comment that it's a candidate for a future > optimization. Yes. I forgot the TODO keyword for some reason. Has been quite some time since I wrote this patch :) I fixed the earily and prefixed the message with TODO. -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel