Hi Randy,
Thank you for taking the time to look into this patch.
On 2/22/20 12:42 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Hi,
One minor nit. Please see inline:
On 2/21/20 11:47 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
Add support of other devices into the Energy Model framework not only the
CPUs. Change the interface to be more unified which can handle other
devices as well.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 133 ++++----
diff --git a/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst b/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst
index 90a345d57ae9..7576820664e5 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst
+++ b/Documentation/power/energy-model.rst
@@ -85,13 +89,20 @@ API.
2.3 Accessing performance domains
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+There is two API functions which provide the access to the energy model:
There are two
Indeed a mistake, I will fix it.
+em_cpu_get() which takes CPU id as an argument and em_pd_get() with device
+pointer as an argument. It depends on the subsystem which interface it is
+going to use, but in case of CPU devices both functions return the same
+performance domain.
+
cheers.
Regards,
Lukasz
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
