Hi,
> +struct dma_buf *virtgpu_gem_prime_export(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> + int flags)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +}
> +
> +struct drm_gem_object *virtgpu_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct dma_buf *buf)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +}
More code duplication.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> index 0c85914d9369..9c428ef03060 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
API change should go to a separate patch.
> +/*
> + * VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_GPU_F_CROSS_DEVICE 2
Hmm, how about VIRTIO_GPU_F_RESOURCE_UUID ?
> @@ -87,6 +92,7 @@ enum virtio_gpu_ctrl_type {
> VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_CAPSET_INFO,
> VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_CAPSET,
> VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_EDID,
> + VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID,
The "assign" doesn't make sense in the reply. I'd name that
VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_UUID or just VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_UUID,
> +/* VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_RESOURCE_ASSIGN_UUID */
> +struct virtio_gpu_resp_resource_assign_uuid {
> + struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr hdr;
> + __u8 uuid[16];
> +};
Same here.
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
