On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:28:40PM -0500, Kenny Ho wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:17 PM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also, a rather trivial high level question. Is drm a good controller > > name given that other controller names are like cpu, memory, io? > > There was a discussion about naming early in the RFC (I believe > RFCv2), the consensuses then was to use drmcg to align with the drm > subsystem. I have no problem renaming it to gpucg or something > similar if that is the last thing that's blocking acceptance. For > now, I would like to get some clarity on the implementation before > having more code churn. As far as precedence goes, we named the other controllers after the resources they control rather than the subsystem: cpu instead of scheduler, memory instead of mm, io instead of block layer etc. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
