On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > All collected together to provide a consistent story in one patch,
> > instead of the somewhat bumpy refactor-evolution leading to this.
> >
> > Also some thoughts on what the next steps could be:
> >
> > - Create a macro called devm_drm_dev_alloc() which essentially wraps
> > the kzalloc(); devm_drm_dev_init(); drmm_add_final_kfree() combo.
> > Needs to be a macro since we'll have to do some typeof trickery and
> > casting to make this fully generic for all drivers that embed struct
> > drm_device into their own thing.
>
> Do you think it would be hard to do this already, in order to avoid
> drmm_add_final_kfree() ?
It's another 31 patches on top of this 52 patch series. Not hard per
se, but there's a lot going on already here, and a lot of this is very
tricky stuff that required endless amounts of reviewing everything.
I'd like to do the more automated stuff as a follow-up if possible,
I'm pretty sure I've not see a huge amount of exceptions from the
normal pattern. Iirc vgem and vkms need a rework to invert their
cleanup logic, so add 2 more patches for those. Everything else
follows the standard pattern iirc.
> > - A lot of the simple drivers now have essentially just
> > drm_dev_unplug(); drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(); as their
> > $bus_driver->remove hook. We could create a devm_mode_config_reset
> > which sets drm_atomic_helper_shutdown as it's cleanup action, and a
> > devm_drm_dev_register with drm_dev_unplug as it's cleanup action,
> > and simple drivers wouldn't have a need for a ->remove function at
> > all, and we could delete them.
> >
> > - For more complicated drivers we need drmm_ versions of a _lot_ more
> > things. All the userspace visible objects (crtc, plane, encoder,
> > crtc), anything else hanging of those (maybe a drmm_get_edid, at
> > least for panels and other built-in stuff).
>
> I think it will get messy if we try to use the managed API for too many
> things.
Hm why? I kinda plan to use it for everything you'd want to clean up
from drm_driver.release.
> > Also some more thoughts on why we're not reusing devm_ with maybe a
> > fake struct device embedded into the drm_device (we can't use the
> > kdev, since that's in each drm_minor).
> >
> > - Code review gets extremely tricky, since every time you see a devm_
> > you need to carefully check whether the fake device (with the
> > drm_device lifetim) or the real device (with the lifetim of the
> > underlying physical device and driver binding) are used. That's not
> > going to help at all, and we have enormous amounts of drivers who
> > use devm_ where they really shouldn't. Having different types makes
> > sure the compiler type checks this for us and ensures correctness.
> >
> > - The set of functions are very much non-overlapping. E.g.
> > devm_ioremap makes total sense, drmm_ioremap has the wrong lifetime,
> > since hw resources need to be cleaned out at driver unbind and wont
> > outlive that like a drm_device. Similar, but other way round for
> > drmm_connector_init (which is the only correct version, devm_ for
> > drm_connector is just buggy). Simply not having the wrong version
> > again prevents bugs.
> >
> > Finally I guess this opens a huge todo for all the drivers. I'm
> > semi-tempted to do a tree-wide s/devm_kzalloc/drmm_kzalloc/ since most
> > likely that'll fix an enormous amount of bugs and most likely not
> > cause any issues at all (aside from maybe holding onto memory slightly
> > too long).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst | 6 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 18 +++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 4 ++
> > include/drm/drm_managed.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
> > index a6b6145fda78..12272b168580 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
> > @@ -138,6 +138,12 @@ Managed Resources
> > .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > :doc: managed resources
> >
> > +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > + :export:
> > +
> > +.. kernel-doc:: include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > + :internal:
> > +
> > Bus-specific Device Registration and PCI Support
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > index 428c569aaaf1..b1827ba53924 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > @@ -258,9 +258,15 @@ void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor)
> > * any other resources allocated at device initialization and drop the driver's
> > * reference to &drm_device using drm_dev_put().
> > *
> > - * Note that the lifetime rules for &drm_device instance has still a lot of
> > - * historical baggage. Hence use the reference counting provided by
> > - * drm_dev_get() and drm_dev_put() only carefully.
> > + * Note that any allocation or resource which is visible to userspace must be
> > + * released only when the final drm_dev_put() is called, and not when the
> > + * driver is unbound from the underlying physical struct &device. Best to use
> > + * &drm_device managed resources with drmm_add_action(), drmm_kmalloc() and
> > + * related functions.
> > + *
> > + * devres managed resources like devm_kmalloc() can only be used for resources
> > + * directly related to the underlying hardware device, and only used in code
> > + * paths fully protected by drm_dev_enter() and drm_dev_exit().
> > *
> > * Display driver example
> > * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > @@ -604,6 +610,9 @@ static void drm_dev_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
> > * arbitrary offset, you must supply a &drm_driver.release callback and control
> > * the finalization explicitly.
> > *
> > + * Note that drivers must call drmm_add_final_kfree() after this function has
> > + * completed successfully.
> > + *
> > * RETURNS:
> > * 0 on success, or error code on failure.
> > */
> > @@ -705,6 +714,9 @@ static void devm_drm_dev_init_release(void *data)
> > * Managed drm_dev_init(). The DRM device initialized with this function is
> > * automatically put on driver detach using drm_dev_put().
> > *
> > + * Note that drivers must call drmm_add_final_kfree() after this function has
> > + * completed successfully.
> > + *
> > * RETURNS:
> > * 0 on success, or error code on failure.
> > */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > index fb44fe65c2cd..7fcbe90d3f46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > @@ -17,10 +17,22 @@
> > /**
> > * DOC: managed resources
> > *
> > - * Inspired by sturct &device managed resources, but tied to the lifetime of
> > + * Inspired by struct &device managed resources, but tied to the lifetime of
> > * struct &drm_device, which can outlive the underlying physical device, usually
> > * when userspace has some open files and other handles to resources still open.
> > + *
> > + * Release actions can be added with drmm_add_action(), memory allocations can
> > + * be done directly with drmm_kmalloc() and the related functions. Everything
> > + * will be released on the final drm_dev_put() in reverse order of how the
> > + * release actions have been added and memory has been allocated at driver load
> > + * time.
>
> Maybe drop "at driver load time" as it could also happen later ?
Maybe "since driver loading started with drm_dev_init()"?
> > + *
> > + * Note that release actions and managed memory can also be added and removed
> > + * during the lifetime of the driver, all the functions are fully concurrent
> > + * safe. But it is recommended to use managed resources only when they change
>
> s/only when they/only for resources that/ ?
>
> > + * rarely, if ever, during the lifetime of the &drm_device instance.
> > */
> > +
> > struct drmres_node {
> > struct list_head entry;
> > drmres_release_t release;
> > @@ -102,6 +114,18 @@ void add_dr(struct drm_device *dev, struct drmres *dr)
> > dr, dr->node.name, (unsigned long) dr->node.size);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_add_final_kfree - add release action for the final kfree()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @data: pointer to the kmalloc allocation containing @dev
> > + *
> > + * Since the allocation containing the struct &drm_device must be allocated
> > + * before it can be initialized with drm_dev_init() there's no way to allocate
> > + * that memory with drmm_kmalloc(). To side-step this chicken-egg problem the
> > + * pointer for this final kfree() must be specified by calling this function. It
> > + * will be released in the final drm_dev_put() for @dev, after all other release
> > + * actions installed through drmm_add_action() have been processed.
> > + */
> > void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *parent)
> > {
> > WARN_ON(dev->managed.final_kfree);
> > @@ -132,6 +156,14 @@ int __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_add_action);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_add_action - remave a managed release action to a &drm_device
>
> s/remave/remove/
>
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @action: release function
> > + * @data: opaque pointer, passed to @action
> > + *
> > + * This function removes a release action added by drmm_add_action.
>
> s/drmm_add_action/drmm_add_action()/
>
> > + */
> > void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > drmres_release_t action,
> > void *data)
> > @@ -160,6 +192,16 @@ void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_remove_action);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kmalloc - &drm_device managed kmalloc()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @size: size of the memory allocation
> > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kmalloc(). The allocated memory is
> > + * automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put(). Memory can also be freed
> > + * before the final drm_dev_put() by calling drmm_kfree().
> > + */
> > void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > struct drmres *dr;
> > @@ -175,6 +217,16 @@ void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_kmalloc);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kstrdup - &drm_device managed kstrdup()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @size: 0 terminated string to be duplicated
>
> s/0 terminated/0-terminated/
>
> > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kstrdup(). The allocated memory is
> > + * automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put() and works exactly like a
> > + * memory allocation obtained by drmm_kmalloc().
> > + */
> > char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device *dev, const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > size_t size;
> > @@ -191,6 +243,15 @@ char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device *dev, const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drmm_kstrdup);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kfree - &drm_device managed kfree()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @data: memory allocation to be freed
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kfree() which can be used to
> > + * release memory allocated through drmm_kmalloc() or any of its related
> > + * functions before the final drm_dev_put() of @dev.
> > + */
> > void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
> > {
> > struct drmres *dr = NULL, *tmp;
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > index edee40e31e4b..0fd7fc6f024e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > @@ -266,6 +266,10 @@ struct drm_driver {
> > *
> > * Optional callback for destroying device data after the final
> > * reference is released, i.e. the device is being destroyed.
> > + *
> > + * This is deprecated, clean up all memory allocations associated with a
> > + * &drm_device using drmm_add_action(), drmm_kmalloc() and related
> > + * managed resources functions.
>
> I'm afraid we can't necessarily do this. Drivers may create multiple
> userspace-facing devices, or other resources used within the kernel (for
> instance a driver could expose both a DRM and a V4L2 device, or
> registers clocks used by other devices). We thus need a .release()
> function in the general case to handle this, as the top-level structure
> needs to be reference-counted.
>
> I agree this isn't the norm, so we can document the .release() function
> as being rarely used, and recommend the drmm_* API, but we can't
> deprecate it completely.
drmm_add_action(drm_device, put_the_overall_thing, the_overall_thing);
is what I have in mind for anyone that still needs a ->release
function for special stuff.
So instead of a single release function you get an unlimited number of
them, and the single release function becomes kinda pointless.
Agreed on all your other minor suggestions, I'll go ahead and add them.
-Daniel
>
> > */
> > void (*release) (struct drm_device *);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > index 573cadca4b3d..0e7616bd0858 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > @@ -8,6 +8,19 @@ struct drm_device;
> >
> > typedef void (*drmres_release_t)(struct drm_device *dev, void *res);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_add_action - add a managed release action to a &drm_device
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @action: function which should be called when @dev is released
> > + * @data: opaque pointer, passed to @action
> > + *
> > + * This function adds the @release action wwith optional parameter @data to the
>
> s/wwith/with/
>
> > + * list of cleanup actions for @dev. The cleanup actions will be run in reverse
> > + * order in the final drm_dev_put() call for @dev.
> > + *
> > + * A release action can be removed before @dev is released by calling
> > + * drmm_remove_action() with matching parameters for @action and @data.
> > + */
> > #define drmm_add_action(dev, action, data) \
> > __drmm_add_action(dev, action, data, #action)
> >
> > @@ -22,12 +35,45 @@ void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *parent);
> >
> > void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) __malloc;
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kzalloc - &drm_device managed kzalloc()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @size: size of the memory allocation
> > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kzalloc(). The allocated memory is
> > + * automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put(). Memory can also be freed
> > + * before the final drm_dev_put() by calling drmm_kfree().
> > + */
> > static inline void *drmm_kzalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > return drmm_kmalloc(dev, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kmalloc_array - &drm_device managed kmalloc_array()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @size: 0 terminated string to be duplicated
>
> s/0 terminated/0-terminated/
>
> > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kmalloc_array(). The allocated
> > + * memory is automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put() and works exactly
> > + * like a memory allocation obtained by drmm_kmalloc().
> > + */
> > static inline void *drmm_kmalloc_array(struct drm_device *dev,
> > size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drmm_kcalloc - &drm_device managed kcalloc()
> > + * @dev: DRM device
> > + * @size: 0 terminated string to be duplicated
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kcalloc(). The allocated memory is
> > + * automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put() and works exactly like a
> > + * memory allocation obtained by drmm_kmalloc().
> > + */
> > {
> > size_t bytes;
> >
> > @@ -41,6 +87,7 @@ static inline void *drmm_kcalloc(struct drm_device *dev,
> > {
> > return drmm_kmalloc_array(dev, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO);
> > }
> > +
> > char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device *dev, const char *s, gfp_t gfp);
> >
> > void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data);
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
