[AMD Public Use]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 12:09 AM
> To: Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lyude@xxxxxxxxxx; Sean Paul
> <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Remove single tx msg restriction.
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:58 AM Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > [AMD Public Use]
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thanks for the mail!
> >
> > I tried to solve this problem by having restriction on sending one msg at a
> time due to hub/dock compatibility problems.
> > From my experience, some branch devices don't handle well on
> > interleaved replies (Dock from HP I think)
>
> Hi Wayne,
> Hmm, that's interesting, do you have a part number of the failing dock so I can
> test it?
>
Hi Paul,
Sorry but it's been quite a while. I can't exactly tell the part number.
If I remember correctly, when the specific branch device receives interleaved replies,
it just doesn't reply to any requests.
> > As the result of that, correct me if I'm wrong, I remember most gpu vendors
> just send one down request at a time now in windows environment.
> > I would suggest the original solution :)
>
> I can't really say what happens on the Windows side of the world, but I suppose
> that makes sense if this is a widespread issue with docks. I do worry about the
> performance hit.
>
> If indeed this is a problem, could we ratelimit per branch device instead of
> globally? Even that would be better than serializing everything.
>
Since the problem was because some branch devices can't simultaneously handle
two replies, I'm afraid that we might still encounter the same problem?
Thanks!
> Sean
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 5:15 AM
> > > To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: lyude@xxxxxxxxxx; Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>; Sean Paul
> > > <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Maarten Lankhorst
> > > <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Maxime Ripard
> > > <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Remove single tx msg restriction.
> > >
> > > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Now that we can support multiple simultaneous replies, remove the
> > > restrictions placed on sending new tx msgs.
> > >
> > > This patch essentially just reverts commit
> > > 5a64967a2f3b ("drm/dp_mst: Have DP_Tx send one msg at a time")
> now
> > > that the problem is solved in a different way.
> > >
> > > Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 14 ++------------
> > > include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 6 ------
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > index 7e6a82efdfc02..cbf0bb0ddeb84 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > @@ -1203,8 +1203,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> > > txmsg->state == DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_SENT) {
> > > mstb->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL;
> > > }
> > > - mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > > -
> > > }
> > > out:
> > > if (unlikely(ret == -EIO) && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP)) {
> > > @@
> > > -1214,7 +1212,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> > > }
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > >
> > > - drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(mgr);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2797,11 +2794,9 @@ static void
> > > process_single_down_tx_qlock(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > ret = process_single_tx_qlock(mgr, txmsg, false);
> > > if (ret == 1) {
> > > /* txmsg is sent it should be in the slots now */
> > > - mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = true;
> > > list_del(&txmsg->next);
> > > } else if (ret) {
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to send msg in q %d\n", ret);
> > > - mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > > list_del(&txmsg->next);
> > > if (txmsg->seqno != -1)
> > > txmsg->dst->tx_slots[txmsg->seqno] = NULL;
> @@
> > > -2841,8
> > > +2836,7 @@ static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (list_is_singular(&mgr->tx_msg_downq) &&
> > > - !mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply)
> > > + if (list_is_singular(&mgr->tx_msg_downq))
> > > process_single_down_tx_qlock(mgr);
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > }
> > > @@ -3822,7 +3816,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > txmsg->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_RX;
> > > mstb->tx_slots[seqno] = NULL;
> > > - mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > >
> > > wake_up_all(&mgr->tx_waitq);
> > > @@ -3830,9 +3823,6 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > out_clear_reply:
> > > - mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > - mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply = false;
> > > - mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > if (msg)
> > > memset(msg, 0, sizeof(struct
> drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
> > > out:
> > > @@ -4670,7 +4660,7 @@ static void drm_dp_tx_work(struct work_struct
> > > *work)
> > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = container_of(work,
> > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr, tx_work);
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > - if (!list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_downq)
> > > && !mgr->is_waiting_for_dwn_reply)
> > > + if (!list_empty(&mgr->tx_msg_downq))
> > > process_single_down_tx_qlock(mgr);
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h index
> 7d0341f94ce1b..fcc30e64c8e7e
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > @@ -619,12 +619,6 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr {
> > > * &drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx.state once they are queued
> > > */
> > > struct mutex qlock;
> > > -
> > > - /**
> > > - * @is_waiting_for_dwn_reply: indicate whether is waiting for
> down
> > > reply
> > > - */
> > > - bool is_waiting_for_dwn_reply;
> > > -
> > > /**
> > > * @tx_msg_downq: List of pending down replies.
> > > */
> > > --
> > > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> > --
> > Wayne Lin
--
Best regards,
Wayne Lin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
