From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1eb013473bff5f95b6fe1ca4dd7deda47257b9c2 ]
Like other cases, it should use rcu protected 'chan' rather
than 'fence->channel' in nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler.
Fixes: 0ec5f02f0e2c ("drm/nouveau: prevent stale fence->channel pointers, and protect with rcu")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index 9118df035b28d..70bb6bb97af87 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler(struct nvif_notify *notify)
fence = list_entry(fctx->pending.next, typeof(*fence), head);
chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
- if (nouveau_fence_update(fence->channel, fctx))
+ if (nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
ret = NVIF_NOTIFY_DROP;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
