On 09/12/2019 10:58, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 7/12/19 23:47, matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Switch probing for the MMSYS to support invocation to a plain
>> paltform device. The driver will be probed by the DRM subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt2701-mm.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt2701-mm.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt2701-mm.c
>> index 054b597d4a73..4a9433c2b2b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt2701-mm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt2701-mm.c
>> @@ -4,14 +4,20 @@
>> * Author: Shunli Wang <shunli.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>
>> #include "clk-mtk.h"
>> #include "clk-gate.h"
>>
>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt2701-clk.h>
>>
>> +struct clk_mt2701_mm_priv {
>> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data;
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct mtk_gate_regs disp0_cg_regs = {
>> .set_ofs = 0x0104,
>> .clr_ofs = 0x0108,
>> @@ -79,23 +85,25 @@ static const struct mtk_gate mm_clks[] = {
>> GATE_DISP1(CLK_MM_TVE_FMM, "mm_tve_fmm", "mm_sel", 14),
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id of_match_clk_mt2701_mm[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys", },
>> - {}
>> -};
>> -
>> static int clk_mt2701_mm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data;
>> int r;
>> - struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
>> + struct clk_mt2701_mm_priv *private;
>> +
>> + private = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!private)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_MM_NR);
>> + private->clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_MM_NR);
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, private);
>>
>> mtk_clk_register_gates(node, mm_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(mm_clks),
>> - clk_data);
>> + private->clk_data);
>>
>> - r = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, clk_data);
>> + r = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
>> + private->clk_data);
>> if (r)
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> "could not register clock provider: %s: %d\n",
>> @@ -104,12 +112,21 @@ static int clk_mt2701_mm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return r;
>> }
>>
>> +static int clk_mt2701_mm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_mt2701_mm_priv *private = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>
> I think that private->clk_data->clks is also kallocated and need to be freed?
>
> But I think that the best approach now is to switch to use devm allocations in
> clk-mt2701-mm.c and this remove function will not be needed.
>
This is an API change which will affect over 50 drivers. For now I'll fix it by
adding a kfree here. I will send a follow-up patch to fix it in the API.
Good catch!
Matthias
>> + kfree(private->clk_data);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct platform_driver clk_mt2701_mm_drv = {
>> .probe = clk_mt2701_mm_probe,
>> + .remove = clk_mt2701_mm_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "clk-mt2701-mm",
>> - .of_match_table = of_match_clk_mt2701_mm,
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -builtin_platform_driver(clk_mt2701_mm_drv);
>> +module_platform_driver(clk_mt2701_mm_drv);
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
