Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-01-28 10:45:58)
> Kinda time to get this sorted. The locking around this really is not
> nice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 7c18a980cd4b..8deff75b484c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -948,6 +948,12 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
>
> mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex);
>
> + if (dev->driver->load) {
> + if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
> + DRM_INFO("drm driver %s is using deprecated ->load callback\n",
> + dev->driver->name);
DRM_WARN() if the plan is to remove it?
That should encourage people to complain louder.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
