On Tuesday 21 Jan 2020 at 10:10:16 (+0100), Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > True. But then we hard-code that a CPU device performance domain can > only be a frequency domain (which is true today). > > The task scheduler (build_perf_domains()) and thermal are already using > cpufreq_cpu_get() to access the cpufreq policy. Now the EM framework > would too for CPU devices. I assume that could work with a couple of > adaptations in Documentation/power/energy-model.rst. Agreed, and if one day we have a real use case where the pd mask and the cpufreq policy mask need to be different, we'll do the necessary changes. But until then I don't see a reason to object to Lukasz' proposal. So +1 from me. Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
