On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:45:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > As Guido Günther reported, get_abs_timeout() in the etnaviv user space > > sometimes passes timeouts with nanosecond values larger than 1000000000, > > which gets rejected after my first patch. > > > > To avoid breaking this, while also not allowing completely arbitrary > > values, set the limit to 1999999999 and use set_normalized_timespec64() > > to get the correct format before comparing it. > > I'm seeing values up to 5 seconds so I need > > if (args->timeout.tv_nsec > (5 * NSEC_PER_SEC)) I assume you're looking at 64-bit, but I suspect userspace needs looking at considering 32-bit. If userspace uses a 32-bit tv_nsec anywhere in the path that it attempts to pass up to 5 seconds in tv_nsec, then this will fail to pass the correct timeout. If that is the case, userspace is buggy, and needs fixing not to pass such large values through tv_nsec irrespective of this issue. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel