Hi Boris. > Just a reminder of my 2 proposals: > > 1/ implement the bridge_ops->pre_enable/post_disable() hooks so you can > split your enable/disable logic in 2 parts and make sure things are > ready when the panel/next bridge tries to send DSI commands > 2/ move everything that's needed to send DSI commands out of the > ->enable() path (maybe in runtime PM resume/suspend hooks) so you > can call that in the DSI transfer path too > > As pointed out by Laurent, #1 doesn't work because some panel drivers > send DSI commands in their ->prepare() hook, and ->pre_enable() methods > are called in reverse order, meaning that the DRM panel bridge driver > would try to issue DSI commands before the DSI host controllers is ready > to send them. I still thing #2 is a good option. Jitao Shi suggested to extend panels so we had a sequence of: prepare_power() <= new callback, here one should NOT be allowed to send DSI commands prepare() enable() # # panel is now ready to show your favourite christmas movie # disable() unprepare() unprepare_power() <= new callback Would this help implement what you suggest above? Relevant panels would then have to be updated - but this is doable. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel