On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 08:31:07PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:56:07PM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:+static struct i915_svm *vm_get_svm(struct i915_address_space *vm) +{ + struct i915_svm *svm = vm->svm; + + mutex_lock(&vm->svm_mutex); + if (svm && !kref_get_unless_zero(&svm->ref)) + svm = NULL;Quite strange to see a get_unless_zero under a lock..
Thanks. Yah I agree (construct taken from a differnt place). It should go away once I swith to mmu_notifier_get/put.
+static void release_svm(struct kref *ref) +{ + struct i915_svm *svm = container_of(ref, typeof(*svm), ref); + struct i915_address_space *vm = svm->vm; + + mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, svm->notifier.mm);This would be a lot better to use mmu_notifier_put to manage the reference and deallocation.
Yah, have that in mind, will use that.
+static u32 i915_svm_build_sg(struct i915_address_space *vm, + struct hmm_range *range, + struct sg_table *st) +{ + struct scatterlist *sg; + u32 sg_page_sizes = 0; + u64 i, npages; + + sg = NULL; + st->nents = 0; + npages = (range->end - range->start) / PAGE_SIZE; + + /* + * No need to dma map the host pages and later unmap it, as + * GPU is not allowed to access it with SVM. + * XXX: Need to dma map host pages for integrated graphics while + * extending SVM support there. + */ + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) { + u64 addr = range->pfns[i] & ~((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1); + + if (sg && (addr == (sg_dma_address(sg) + sg->length))) { + sg->length += PAGE_SIZE; + sg_dma_len(sg) += PAGE_SIZE; + continue; + } + + if (sg) + sg_page_sizes |= sg->length; + + sg = sg ? __sg_next(sg) : st->sgl; + sg_dma_address(sg) = addr; + sg_dma_len(sg) = PAGE_SIZE;This still can't be like this - assigning pfn to 'dma_address' is fundamentally wrong. Whatever explanation you had, this needs to be fixed up first before we get to this patch.
The pfn is converted into a device address which goes into sg_dma_address. Ok, let me think about what else we can do here. As device addresses are not dma mapped, may be we can look at it as direct mapped (__phys_to_dma())? Or perhaps define our own sgl. Not sure, will look into it.
+static int i915_range_fault(struct svm_notifier *sn, + struct drm_i915_gem_vm_bind *args, + struct sg_table *st, u64 *pfns) +{ + unsigned long timeout = + jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HMM_RANGE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT); + /* Have HMM fault pages within the fault window to the GPU. */ + struct hmm_range range = { + .notifier = &sn->notifier, + .start = sn->notifier.interval_tree.start, + .end = sn->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1, + .pfns = pfns, + .pfn_shift = PAGE_SHIFT, + .flags = i915_range_flags, + .values = i915_range_values, + .default_flags = (range.flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] | + ((args->flags & I915_GEM_VM_BIND_READONLY) ? + 0 : range.flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE])), + .pfn_flags_mask = 0, + + }; + struct i915_svm *svm = sn->svm; + struct mm_struct *mm = sn->notifier.mm; + struct i915_address_space *vm = svm->vm; + u32 sg_page_sizes; + u64 flags; + long ret; + + while (true) { + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) + return -EBUSY; + + range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(range.notifier); + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); + ret = hmm_range_fault(&range, 0); + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); + if (ret <= 0) { + if (ret == 0 || ret == -EBUSY) + continue; + return ret; + } + + sg_page_sizes = i915_svm_build_sg(vm, &range, st); + mutex_lock(&svm->mutex); + if (mmu_interval_read_retry(range.notifier, + range.notifier_seq)) { + mutex_unlock(&svm->mutex); + continue; + } + break; + } + + flags = (args->flags & I915_GEM_VM_BIND_READONLY) ? + I915_GTT_SVM_READONLY : 0; + ret = svm_bind_addr_commit(vm, args->start, args->length, + flags, st, sg_page_sizes); + mutex_unlock(&svm->mutex);This looks better..+int i915_gem_vm_bind_svm_buffer(struct i915_address_space *vm, + struct drm_i915_gem_vm_bind *args) +{ + struct svm_notifier sn; + struct i915_svm *svm; + struct mm_struct *mm; + struct sg_table st; + u64 npages, *pfns; + int ret = 0; + + svm = vm_get_svm(vm); + if (!svm) + return -EINVAL; + + mm = svm->notifier.mm; + if (mm != current->mm) { + ret = -EPERM; + goto bind_done; + }Bit strange, we have APIs now to make it fairly easy to deal with multiple processe, (ie the get/put scheme) why have this restriction?
Nothing particular, just thought of supporting it later if required.
+ + args->length += (args->start & ~PAGE_MASK); + args->start &= PAGE_MASK; + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%sing start 0x%llx length 0x%llx vm_id 0x%x\n", + (args->flags & I915_GEM_VM_BIND_UNBIND) ? + "Unbind" : "Bind", args->start, args->length, + args->vm_id); + if (args->flags & I915_GEM_VM_BIND_UNBIND) { + i915_gem_vm_unbind_svm_buffer(vm, args->start, args->length); + goto bind_done; + } + + npages = args->length / PAGE_SIZE; + if (unlikely(sg_alloc_table(&st, npages, GFP_KERNEL))) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto bind_done; + } + + pfns = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!pfns)) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto range_done; + } + + ret = svm_bind_addr_prepare(vm, args->start, args->length); + if (unlikely(ret)) + goto prepare_done; + + sn.svm = svm; + ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&sn.notifier, mm, + args->start, args->length, + &i915_svm_mni_ops); + if (!ret) { + ret = i915_range_fault(&sn, args, &st, pfns); + mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&sn.notifier); + }success oriented flow...
Ok.
+static int +i915_svm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, + const struct mmu_notifier_range *update) +{ + struct i915_svm *svm = container_of(mn, struct i915_svm, notifier); + unsigned long length = update->end - update->start; + + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("start 0x%lx length 0x%lx\n", update->start, length); + if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(update)) + return -EAGAIN; + + i915_gem_vm_unbind_svm_buffer(svm->vm, update->start, length); + return 0; +}I still think you should strive for a better design than putting a notifier across the entire address space..
Yah, thought it could be later optimization. If I think about it, it has be be a new user API to set the range, or an intermediate data structure for tracking the bound ranges. Will look into it. Thanks, Niranjana
+ +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SVM) +struct i915_svm { + /* i915 address space */ + struct i915_address_space *vm; + + struct mmu_notifier notifier; + struct mutex mutex; /* protects svm operations */ + /* + * XXX: Probably just make use of mmu_notifier's reference + * counting (get/put) instead of our own. + */Yes Jason
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
