On 12/4/19 1:08 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 04.12.19 um 12:36 schrieb Thomas Hellström (VMware):
On 12/4/19 12:11 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 03.12.19 um 14:22 schrieb Thomas Hellström (VMware):
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
This helper is used to align user-space buffer object addresses to
huge page boundaries, minimizing the chance of alignment mismatch
between user-space addresses and physical addresses.
Mhm, I'm wondering if that is really such a good idea.
Could you elaborate? What drawbacks do you see?
Main problem for me seems to be that I don't fully understand what the
get_unmapped_area callback is doing.
It makes sure that, if there is a chance that we could use huge
page-table entries, virtual address huge page boundaries are perfectly
aligned to physical address huge page boundaries, which is if not a CPU
hardware requirement, at least a kernel requirement currently.
For example why do we need to use drm_vma_offset_lookup_locked() to
adjust the pgoff?
The mapped offset should be completely irrelevant for finding some
piece of userspace address space or am I totally off here?
Because the unmodified pgoff assumes that physical address boundaries
are perfectly aligned with file offset boundaries, which is typical for
all other subsystems.
That's not true for TTM, however, where a buffer object start physical
address may be huge page aligned, but the file offset is always page
aligned. We could of course change that to align also file offsets to
huge page size boundaries, but with the above adjustment, that's not
needed. I opted for the adjustment.
Thanks,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
