On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:22:16AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:23:45 +0200 > Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Am 16.10.19 um 15:05 schrieb Pekka Paalanen: > > > > specifically be available in production. So a new file in some fs > > > somewhere it should be, and userspace in production can read it at will > > > to attach to a bug report. > > > > > > Those semantics, "only use this content for attaching into a bug > > > report" should be made very clear in the UAPI. > > > > Has this ever worked? As soon as a userspace program starts depending on > > the content of this file, it becomes kabi. From the incidents I know, > > Linus has always been quite strict about this. Even for broken interfaces. > > The kernel log content is not kabi, is it? I've seen it change plenty > during the years. This would be just another similar log with free-form > text. > Ok, so given the more structured version of this set [1] was not well received, are we all comfortable going with the freeform approach in this version? Sean [1]- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-November/243230.html > > Thanks, > pq -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
