Hi Dave, On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:13:16 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:55, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:37:06 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > And apparently nobody bothered to tell me about the semantic conflict > > > > with the media tree due to the changed calling convention of > > > > cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister(). Didn't that show up in linux-next? > > > > > > I can see no mention of it, I've got > > > > > > Hans saying > > > > > > "This will only be a problem if a new CEC adapter driver is added to the media > > > subsystem for v5.5, but I am not aware of any plans for that." when I > > > landed that > > > in my tree, but I assume the ao-cec change in the media tree collided with it. > > > > > > But I hadn't seen any mention of it from -next before you mentioned it now. > > > > See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191014111225.66b36035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Indeed, the misc team didn't remention that to me, when I pulled their > tree, perhaps I should make them do so, not sure why my search > yesterday failed to find this in my inbox. It was form Oct 14 ... I should have resent it earlier this week (or last) as a reminder. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp8IOpemVzRt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
