Hi, > > I can see now why you want a private address space for each object. > > Does that imply we need an anon_inode for each gem object? Or is > > there some more lightweight way to do this? > > I have no idea whether we can get a address_space struct without an inode > (and no disasters). Anything building on shmem helpers should be able to use obj->filp->f_mapping, right? So allocating an inode unconditionally doesn't look like a good plan. Guess I'll go look at ttm-local changes for starters and see how it goes. cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
