On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:55:57 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 19/11/2019 17:06, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >> The userspace apps need to do this. If they're using single-buffering, then > >> using the dirtyfb ioctl should do the trick, after the SGX has finished > >> drawing. > > > > Sounds like that's not happening. > > > > But why would the userspace app need to know this might be needed for > > a DSI command mode display and that it's not needed for HDMI? > > When double-buffering, the userspace doesn't need to care, as the > page-flip ioctl explicitly tells that the buffer is ready. > > When single buffering, either the userspace has to tell that the buffer > is now ready, or the kernel has to guess based on something. But afaics, > the latter is always a guess, and may not be a good guess. > > The kernel could trigger a delayed update based on, say, page fault if > drawing with CPU. But how much delayed... And with this scenario, we > would somehow need to find a way to catch the writes from any IP to the > buffer, and afaik there's no such thing. > > >> It's probably somewhat difficult if EGL is controlling the display, as, > >> afaik, SGX EGL is closed source, and that's probably where it should be > >> done. > >> > >> But adding back the hacky omap gem sync stuff, and then somehow guessing > >> from the sync finish that some display needs to be updated... It just does > >> not sound right to me. > > > > Right it's ugly. Still sounds like we need something in the kernel > > that knows "this is a DSI command mode LCD and needs to be updated". > well, if we look broader around and not only at the remaining displays to be converted from omapdrm to generic and look at more displays, there are also EPDs. > I think one option is to refresh the command mode display all the time. > Either using a timer, or trigger updates based on the previous update > being finished. > > Of course, that's kind of against the whole point of manual update > display, but then it should effectively behave like a conventional > always-updating display (except your HW is more expensive and consumes > more power than a conventional display). > And again as an extreme example about power consumption: EPDs. So I guess we need a generic interface for userspace-triggered refreshes anyways. And in that case that are only partly refreshes. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
