19.11.2019 09:31, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:02:30PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> index 1238e35653d1..593954324259 100644
>> --- a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> +++ b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ struct tegra_mc_reset_ops {
>> const struct tegra_mc_reset *rst);
>> };
>>
>> +struct tegra_mc_icc_node {
>> + const char *name;
>> + unsigned int id;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct tegra_mc_soc {
>> const struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
>> unsigned int num_clients;
>> @@ -160,6 +165,9 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {
>> const struct tegra_mc_reset_ops *reset_ops;
>> const struct tegra_mc_reset *resets;
>> unsigned int num_resets;
>> +
>> + const struct tegra_mc_icc_node *icc_nodes;
>> + unsigned int num_icc_nodes;
>> };
>>
>> struct tegra_mc {
>> @@ -184,4 +192,22 @@ struct tegra_mc {
>> int tegra_mc_write_emem_configuration(struct tegra_mc *mc, unsigned long rate);
>> unsigned int tegra_mc_get_emem_device_count(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_TEGRA
>> +int tegra_icc_mc_setup_interconnect(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>> +int tegra_icc_emc_setup_interconnect(struct device *emc_dev,
>> + unsigned int dram_data_bus_width_bytes);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int tegra_icc_mc_setup_interconnect(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int
>> +tegra_icc_emc_setup_interconnect(struct device *emc_dev,
>> + unsigned int dram_data_bus_width_bytes)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Is there really any reason why we should make this support optional? It
> seems to me like we would always want this enabled once it's tested and
> known to work.
There is always some room for bugs, should be better to have an option
to disable ICC entirely (IMO).
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
