On 18/11/2019 12:35, Daniel Vetter wrote: > No in-tree users left. > > Note that this is one of the few (if only) implementations of dma-buf > that provided a kmap, but not a vmap implemenation. Given that the > only real user (in-tree at least) of kmap was tegra, and it's > impossible to buy a chip with tegra host1x and ompadrm on the same > SoC, there's no problem here. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 21 --------------------- > 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) We're using dma_buf_kmap in TI kernel, in some rpmsg code: https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_rpc_dmabuf.c?h=ti-linux-4.19.y I'm not familiar with the code, Cc'ing Suman. In any case, if no one else needs dmabuf kmap, I would guess that TI doesn't need it either... Presuming that's the case, for the omapdrm part: Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> Also, don't downplay the 32bit kernels, there are still plenty of users for arm32, and will be for a long time =) Tomi -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
