On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:52 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
> <james.qian.wang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:39:54PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:01:53AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:09:54PM +0000, Ayan Halder wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> > > > > > There are afbc helpers available.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h | 1 -
> > > > > > .../arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c | 44 +++++++------------
> > > > > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > > > > > index 32273cf18f7c..607eea80e60c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_format_caps.h
> > > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_LAYOUT_ALIGNMENT 8
> > > > > > #define AFBC_HEADER_SIZE 16
> > > > > > -#define AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT 128
> > > > > > #define AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS 256
> > > > > > #define AFBC_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 1024
> > > > > > #define AFBC_TH_BODY_START_ALIGNMENT 4096
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > > > > > index 1b01a625f40e..e9c87551a5b8 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_framebuffer.c
> > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > > > > > * Author: James.Qian.Wang <james.qian.wang@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_afbc.h>
> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_device.h>
> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h>
> > > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
> > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file,
> > > > > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &kfb->base;
> > > > > > const struct drm_format_info *info = fb->format;
> > > > > > struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> > > > > > - u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, n_blocks, bpp;
> > > > > > - u64 min_size;
> > > > > > + u32 alignment_w = 0, alignment_h = 0, alignment_header, bpp;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, mode_cmd->handles[0]);
> > > > > > if (!obj) {
> > > > > > @@ -52,19 +52,15 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file,
> > > > > > return -ENOENT;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - switch (fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) {
> > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_32x8:
> > > > > > - alignment_w = 32;
> > > > > > - alignment_h = 8;
> > > > > > - break;
> > > > > > - case AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_16x16:
> > > > > > - alignment_w = 16;
> > > > > > - alignment_h = 16;
> > > > > > - break;
> > > > > > - default:
> > > > > > - WARN(1, "Invalid AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE: %lld.\n",
> > > > > > - fb->modifier & AFBC_FORMAT_MOD_BLOCK_SIZE_MASK);
> > > > > > - break;
> > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_get_superblk_wh(fb->modifier, &alignment_w, &alignment_h))
> > > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if ((alignment_w != 16 || alignment_h != 16) &&
> > > > > > + (alignment_w != 32 || alignment_h != 8)) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported afbc tile w/h [%d/%d]\n",
> > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > To be honest, the previous code looks much more readable
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* tiled header afbc */
> > > > > > @@ -84,20 +80,14 @@ komeda_fb_afbc_size_check(struct komeda_fb *kfb, struct drm_file *file,
> > > > > > goto check_failed;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - n_blocks = (kfb->aligned_w * kfb->aligned_h) / AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS;
> > > > > > - kfb->offset_payload = ALIGN(n_blocks * AFBC_HEADER_SIZE,
> > > > > > - alignment_header);
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > bpp = komeda_get_afbc_format_bpp(info, fb->modifier);
> > > > > > - kfb->afbc_size = kfb->offset_payload + n_blocks *
> > > > > > - ALIGN(bpp * AFBC_SUPERBLK_PIXELS / 8,
> > > > > > - AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT);
> > > > > > - min_size = kfb->afbc_size + fb->offsets[0];
> > > > > > - if (min_size > obj->size) {
> > > > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("afbc size check failed, obj_size: 0x%zx. min_size 0x%llx.\n",
> > > > > > - obj->size, min_size);
> > > > > We need kfb->offset_payload and kfb->afbc_size to set some registers
> > > > > in d71_layer_update(). At this moment I feel like punching myself for
> > > > > making the suggestion to consider abstracting some of the komeda's afbc
> > > > > checks. To me it does not look like komeda(in the current shape) can take
> > > > > much advantage of the generic _afbc_fb_check() function (as was suggested
> > > > > previously by Danvet).
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I will let james.qian.wang@xxxxxxx,
> > > > > Mihail.Atanassov@xxxxxxx, Ben.Davis@xxxxxxx comment here to see if
> > > > > there could be a way of abstracting the afbc bits from komeda.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi all:
> > > >
> > > > Since the current generic drm_afbc helpers only support afbc_1.1, but
> > > > komeda needs support both afbc1.1/1.2, so I think we can:
> > > > - Add afbc1.2 support to drm afbc helpers.
> > > > - for the afbc_payload_offset, can we add this member to
> > > > drm_framebuffer ?
> > > > - The aligned_w/h are important for afbc, so can we have them in
> > > > drm_framebuffer ?
> > >
> > > How expensive is it to recompute these from a struct drm_framebuffer?
> > >
> > > I'd just go with one function which computes all these derived values, and
> > > stuffs them into a struct drm_afbc. Then drivers call that once or so.
> > >
> >
> > A struct drm_afbc, good idea, I like it. :-)
> >
> > and we can compute it when do the afbc size check like
> >
> > drm_afbc_check_fb_size(..., &komeda_fb->drm_afbc);
>
> Discussed this also with Andrzej on irc on where exactly to place
> stuff. I think ideally we'd be able to get rid of the custom
> malidp_fb_create completely, and komeda should also be able to get rid
> of most of the open-coded checks (it's largely reinveting
> drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs, imo better to just call that first, then
> then do a few more calls of the specific things you need to have
> computed in addition).
> -Daniel
The afbc support is the only reason why malidp/komeda define our own
fb_create(), it is good for komeda and malidp if we put afbc support
directly into the standard drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs.
BTW:
can we add one more argument: fb_struct_size to
drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(..., size_t fb_struct_size);
then driver can use it to extend its own fb struct and add some private
infos.
Thanks
James
> >
> > Thanks.
> > James
> >
> > > For reworking drm_framebuffer itself I think it's probably a bit too
> > > earlier. And if we do it, we should maybe go a bit more bold, aiming to
> > > property-fy all the framebuffer settings, maybe even making it extensible,
> > > and have drivers handle a corresponding drm_framebuffer_state.
> > >
> > > A third option would be to create a drm_afbc_framebuffer which embeds
> > > drm_framebuffer and which drivers would need to use. But also feels a bit
> > > like too much churn. Recomputing should be quick enough and much easier.
> > > -Daniel
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks anyways for taking a stab at this.
> > > > > -Ayan
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!drm_afbc_check_fb_size(mode_cmd->pitches[0], bpp,
> > > > > > + mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height,
> > > > > > + alignment_w, alignment_h,
> > > > > > + obj->size, mode_cmd->offsets[0],
> > > > > > + AFBC_SUPERBLK_ALIGNMENT))
> > > > > > goto check_failed;
> > > > > > - }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > fb->obj[0] = obj;
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
