https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205393 --- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher (alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx) --- (In reply to haro41 from comment #4) > Yes, your patch works and has the same effect, apparently. > > What confused me and the reason why i prefered to leave the > vega10_update_avfs() call before the flag modification, was the code inside > vega10_update_avfs(): > > static int vega10_update_avfs(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr) > { > struct vega10_hwmgr *data = hwmgr->backend; > > if (data->need_update_dpm_table & DPMTABLE_OD_UPDATE_VDDC) { > vega10_avfs_enable(hwmgr, false); > } else if (data->need_update_dpm_table) { > vega10_avfs_enable(hwmgr, false); > vega10_avfs_enable(hwmgr, true); > } else { > vega10_avfs_enable(hwmgr, true); > } > > return 0; > } > > Here is a disable/enable sequence inserted, perhaps for a reason? It's needed to disable the current AFVS settings before reapplying the new ones. That shouldn't be necessary with the DPMTABLE_OD_UPDATE_VDDC flag set because in that case, we just disable AVFS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
