Hey, On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 11:30, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:58:02AM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote: > > This approach also future proof's us to be able to label any handles, not just > > GEM handle. > > I don't expect we'll ever merge any non-gem drivers in the future anymore. > Hence this really only makes sense if vmwgfx wants it, that's the only > use-case for this generic-ism here. If vmwgfx doesn't have a use or jump > on board with this, imo better to just make this specific to gem and be > done. VMware were the exact people who asked it for to be handle-agnostic and not GEM-specific ... Given that we already have handle-agnostic calls like FBs in particular, I think it makes sense to have this one just follow that. It's not much code and doesn't really imply any heavy change for the rest of DRM. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
