On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > From: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fill in the cec_connector_info when calling cec_notifier_conn_register(). > > Signed-off-by: Dariusz Marcinkiewicz <darekm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > index 8262b44b776e..b0620842fa3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c > @@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv, > struct drm_device *drm) > { > struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector; > + struct cec_connector_info conn_info; > + struct cec_notifier *notifier; > int ret; > > connector->interlace_allowed = 1; > @@ -1353,6 +1355,17 @@ static int tda998x_connector_init(struct tda998x_priv *priv, > if (ret) > return ret; > > + cec_fill_conn_info_from_drm(&conn_info, connector); > + > + notifier = cec_notifier_conn_register(priv->cec_glue.parent, > + NULL, &conn_info); > + if (!notifier) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex); > + priv->cec_notify = notifier; > + mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex); As per my previous comments, this is a single-copy atomic operation. Either priv->cec_notify is set or it isn't; there is no intermediate value. It can't be set to a value until cec_notifier_conn_register() has completed. So the lock doesn't help. > + > drm_connector_attach_encoder(&priv->connector, > priv->bridge.encoder); > > @@ -1372,6 +1385,11 @@ static void tda998x_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) > { > struct tda998x_priv *priv = bridge_to_tda998x_priv(bridge); > > + mutex_lock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex); > + cec_notifier_conn_unregister(priv->cec_notify); > + priv->cec_notify = NULL; > + mutex_unlock(&priv->cec_notify_mutex); This is the only case where the lock makes sense - to ensure that any of the cec_notifier_set_phys_addr*() functions aren't called concurrently with it. However, there's no locking around the instance in tda998x_connector_get_modes(), so have you ensured that that function can't be called concurrently? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel