Hi Thomas. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:04:06PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > DRM uses FOURCC constants to describe pixel formats, fbdev uses a > per-component bitfield structure. The functions in this patch convert > between the two. > A few nits below. > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.c | 435 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.h | 23 ++ > 2 files changed, 458 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.h > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.c > index 0cb46d2c98c3..af45358a156a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbconv_helper.c > @@ -1 +1,436 @@ > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > + > +#include <asm/byteorder.h> > + > +#include <linux/fb.h> <asm/*> after <linux/*> So we in this way pick the more general include file first. > + > +struct format_map { > + bool (*is_format)(const struct fb_var_screeninfo *fb_var); > + uint32_t format; > +}; We are in the kernel - where I think u32 is preferred over the longer uint32_t. If I grep in drm/* then they seems be be equally popular, so feel free to ignore this comment. > +static void set_fb_bitfield(struct fb_bitfield *bits, __u32 offset, > + __u32 length) This is not uapi - so u32 is preferred. Both comments apply to the whole file. I did not see that this was wired into the kernel-doc in Documentation/ but maybe I just missed it. With my comments considered you can add: Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> All code looks sane, but as I have not grasped the bigger picture this can hardly be a review. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel